Obama: Notes from a civil rights attorney

Editor’s Note: The following article is written by Steve Bergstein, Planet Waves’ in-house civil rights lawyer and blogger for our Psychsound area. Today, he weighs in on the Obama presidency and the effects a constitutional law professor will have on the Supreme Court. –RA

John Paul Stevens. 88 year old liberal Justice who obviously cannot live forever. Photo from Wikipedia.
John Paul Stevens. 88 year old liberal Justice who obviously cannot live forever, but who has made a respectable go of it. Official photo from U.S. Supreme Court.

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN? No one knows. People on my side of the political spectrum have never experienced this before. All we’ve known is failure and disappointment. I’m too young to remember Richard Nixon’s resignation in 1974. That must have been euphoric: the fall of a White House criminal. It’s been downhill ever since. Jimmy Carter generates no nostalgia, and Bill Clinton’s election in 1992 was fine as far as it went, if only because he ousted the first President Bush, but Clinton was a moderate centrist who sold out his values each and every day.

The way we feel about the election of Barack Obama will stay with us for a long time. He is not a bullshitter like Bill Clinton. We know he sees the world the way that we do, but that through necessity he will have to make compromises to work within the system and to avoid over-reaching. But as I wrote a few weeks ago, we know this about Obama: he will not start any bullshit wars like Iraq, and even if he is merely adequate at appointing federal judges, any of his choices would be an improvement over George W. Bush, who remade the federal judiciary in his own image.

Much will be written about the meaning of Obama’s victory. Let me talk about what it means to me. As a civil rights lawyer and a student of American political history, there is nothing more important to me than the court system. It was the federal courts in the 1950s and 1960s which made this country free. It was the federal courts which breathed life into the Bill of Rights, expansively interpreting the First Amendment, the rules against unreasonable search and seizures, false arrest, racial justice and all the other values that truly separate this country from the despotic regime that Dick Cheney fantasizes about when he goes to sleep at night.

The president’s most far-reaching legacy is the Supreme Court. His appointments will outlast his administration. These days, Supreme Court justices stay on the Court for at least 20 years, and advancements in physical health mean that some of them hang around will into their 80s. Richard Nixon may have fled the White House during the Watergate scandal in the mid-1970s, but he appointed four justices, including William Rehnquist, my all-time least favorite judge, who nearly always went the other way on civil and constitutional rights. Rehnquist’s decisions will be with us long after we die, which means that the tentacles of Richard Nixon will always be strangling us and our grandchildren.

As it now stands, of the nine justices on the Supreme Court, only two were appointed by Democrats: Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, both Clinton appointees. They are not leftists, but intellectually honest center-liberals. Ginsburg is in her 70s, and I don’t see her serving for another eight years. The two other liberals on the Court, John Paul Stevens and David Souter, are both Republican appointees who have a mind of their own and turned into wonderful judges who would sooner lay down in front of a John Deere tractor than allow for the erosion of civil liberties. That’s more than I can say for Clarence Thomas, a terrible judge who has gone out of his way to offend liberals and advocates of constitutional freedoms. But John Paul Stevens is 88 years old. That’s right, 88 years old. Souter reportedly doesn’t like Washington and could retire at any time. Steven and Souter will leave before Clarence Thomas does.

Justice Anthony Kennedy. A Republican who sometimes does the right thing. Photo from Wikipedia.
Justice Anthony Kennedy. A Republican who sometimes does the right thing. Official photo.

Need a scorecard yet? We have four liberals on the Court. The other five are conservatives, and they are young enough to outlast two Obama terms in the White House. They were appointed by more ideological presidents who wanted right wingers on the Court for decades. They have succeeded. The conventional wisdom — which I agree with — is that we now have four liberals, four conservatives, and one center-right justice on the Court who usually sides with the conservatives but sometimes steps in when the conservatives go too far. I’m talking about Anthony Kennedy, who has cast the critical vote to uphold abortion rights, the rights of detainees at Guantanamo and same-sex sodomy. The conservatives on the Court have moved so far to the right that Kennedy now looks like a moderate.

Do you see how fragile the current state of the Supreme Court is? Another Republican administration would have been the death knell for the advancement of civil rights. Most people do not pay attention to what the Court does, but Court-junkies know that the Supreme Court is the last bastion of civil rights and constitutional values in this country. That hangs in the balance as we speak.

The good news is that Obama and his Vice President, Joe Biden, will not allow for any Supreme Court shenanigans. I don’t say this as a fawning fan. I say this because both Obama and Biden were constitutional law professors. They know how important the Supreme Court is, and I am certain they are already thinking about who they would appoint to the Court once a vacancy opens up. We call this intelligent governance, something that has not existed in this country for many years. Never before have constitutional law professors held the Presidency and Vice Presidency. Out society does not value intellectual thinking, but this is a momentous occasion, though it shouldn’t surprise us. It’s like having a civil engineer serve as highway superintendent in your hometown. Over the last eight years we had an arsonist serve as the fire chief.

People may not remember this, but in 1987 Joe Biden was the U.S. senator who spearheaded the rejection of Reagan nominee Robert Bork for the Supreme Court. Bork would have been a disaster: a right wing ideologue with neither the temperament nor the grace to serve on the Court. Biden deserves a medal for this victory. Now he’s the Vice President. Some people wanted Hillary Clinton as Vice President. I wanted someone who scuttled the Bork nomination. Biden is a better choice than we think.

There are many things that give us hope as a result of this election. But hope is like potential: it hasn’t reached fruition yet. I don’t merely hope that Obama will save the Supreme Court. I know that he will do so. Allowing a constitutional law professor to pick Supreme Court justices is like allowing a baseball fanatic to select players for the Hall of Fame. They waited their whole life for that moment. Obama will not screw it up, I can assure you. It’s the first thing that I thought about when the networks announced Obama’s victory on Election night. It’s the first thing I thought about when I woke up the morning after the election. It’s an amazing feeling to know that everything is going to be all right. We have not felt this way for a very long time. And I, for one, will savor this moment.

For Planet Waves, this is

Steve Bergstein

7 thoughts on “Obama: Notes from a civil rights attorney”

  1. As a former lawyer, I agree heartily with Steve. One of the things that made me happy about Obama was the fact that he KNOWS the Constitution. I have been worried about how we could restore its glory after Bush and company have messed with it. The ultra-conservative Supremes are not going away soon. I had hoped for an impeachment of Bush and/or Cheney for their fiddling with our precious rights, but no one was brave enough on that one.

    If anyone can think of a way, I bet our new president will!

    I also agree with IO – some lawyers need to make stuff happen – and it starts with the law suits against Prop 8. For one thing, marriage is left to the States (well, until Bush and company tried to wrest that privilege away). It would require a Constitutional amendment to do otherwise. And maybe that is what we need – a Constitutional right to marriage for everyone!

  2. I was wary of Obama when he was running against Clinton.

    He struck me like every male I met in filmschool who thought he was going to be the next Spielberg, but when it came time to see the fruits of their labor, they fell short.

    So I soon began to watch people who talk the talk and don’t walk the walk. [The film “Hustle and Flow” has a great speech about this incidentally. :-)]

    That’s how I discern between those that actually “do” and those that actually blow a lot of hot air around.

    Obama earned my trust by walking the walk, with the brilliant campaign he ran. I think people overlook that too easily. He was competing against formidable opponents.

    More importantly, he said he was going to run a clean campaign, without tearing anyone down, and he did. Even when Clinton caved to her “lesser angels” in the snake pit we call politics, he did not, and that right there proves this guy means what he says, against all odds.

    He’s not perfect, but so far, the quality of his achievements speak volumes.

    You see this as well in the way he treats people. He was always more than polite to Clinton and McCain, and the body language witnessed between he and his wife say a lot about this man.

    Yes, politicians can be great actors, but they’re not this good. A lesser man would have snapped underneath the pressure and after 2 years we would have been able to see behind the facade.

    That being said, quick question, and pardon my naivete, (because as a non-American citizen i’m not terribly well versed in US laws), but why was there a referendum for Prop 8? Isn’t this a human rights issue that needs to be brought to the Supreme Court? As Victoria mentioned earlier, some lawyers need to be getting off their butts and making stuff happen. 🙂

  3. “We have no way of knowing what Obama sees or doesn’t see in his heart of hearts. I would caution all of us (including myself) against projecting too much of ourselves onto this very human man. 53% of the nation is swooning in new love. Let us keep our eyes open, feet on the ground, and hearts shielded — yes, shielded, for now. Let Obama prove himself.”

    ketchup:

    Couldn’t agree more. And though this last year I’ve had some heartbreak–FISA being one of them, I think this man knows he needs to earn our trust every day. People in the country have been lied to for too long.

    Joe Trippi has an interesting idea. Its a public website to the WHite House called MyWhiteHouse.gov. An interactive site between Americans and the White House. I think it should have its own staff and tie in to the job descrip or under the management of the White House communications director, who I understand is going to be Robert Gibbs.

  4. I like “ketchup1”. And let’s stay focussed on constitutional law. You are right, and we will be watching. Since you are skeptical, I hope you will be voicing. Obama said he will listen.

  5. I heartily agree with “even if he is merely adequate at appointing federal judges, any of his choices would be an improvement over George W. Bush.”

    However, when I read things like “We know he sees the world the way that we do” I think about that void-of-course moon on election day.

    We have no way of knowing what Obama sees or doesn’t see in his heart of hearts. I would caution all of us (including myself) against projecting too much of ourselves onto this very human man. 53% of the nation is swooning in new love. Let us keep our eyes open, feet on the ground, and hearts shielded — yes, shielded, for now. Let Obama prove himself.

  6. Steve… I was a teenager during the Watergate hearings, but had many adult friends who were still resonating with the sense of social justice and power that came from forcing an end to the Viet Nam war.

    The fact is, Bush/Cheney pulled off crap way more heinous than Nixon’s dirty tricks, and we stood around, soporific as cows in an poppy field, through *all* of it.

    Speaking of mah fellow Texans. Now *they* are going to get busy. Cheney is still king-daddy for the biggest construction company in the world – and I am here to tell you that is code for ‘destruction, detention and torture.’ Halliburton has ‘officially’ divested their assassins division (KBR), but that’s just paperwork.

    The faster the new administration can bring this behemoth to heel, the safer –no make that ‘authentically-freed’– we all will be.

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8258

  7. Your writing inspires me to put the Constitution on my winter reading list. With my limited understanding of how the courts work, I do not understand why defending the constitution is not every attorney and judge’s number one duty. How does that get lost? Why do people get into law anyway? What’s that bar where all the attorney’s hang out, about?

    My guess is that money value replaced real value. And of course, we threw the church stuff in the mix. Not that the commandments are a bad thing. It’s everything that goes along with it. My favorite is the 5th. Thou shall not kill. My sister’s church has changed that to thou shall not kill, except in time of war. Not defense (which is open to interpretation) but war.

    Anyway, glad you are out there. Hope there are more. Time to step up to the plate.

Leave a Comment