By Judith Gayle | Political Waves
I adore mysteries and enigmas. I dote on picture puzzles, a guilty pleasure, infrequently indulged, and a nice diversion when trapped by a mantle of winter snow. We haven’t had but a day or two of snow this season, but with politics as they are, I haven’t missed it this year. I suspect that my talent for unearthing the hidden extends to ferreting out the connective tissue in any argument and is complements of my Scorpio Venus conjunct the midheaven, quietly searching out the dark corners. Given the amount of time I spend scouring the news for the missing pieces, jumping two or three moves ahead of any given situation to investigate the possibilities, you’d think that I’d play a good game of chess, but I don’t. I’m not very competitive. Basically, I’m just driven to fill in the blanks, round out the big picture and figure out where we are on the bell curve. That means I’m very busy these days, rooting around in the flailing psyche of a young nation’s business.
There are some signs of progress. The media, responding to public pressure, is getting better at telling the truth, have you noticed? Television anchors are asking harder questions, demanding actual rationales for some of the more egregious statements made by politicos. Back when there were established boundaries for politicians, well before the Orwellian double-speak practiced by the Bushies became kosher, it was seldom necessary to take the offensive position, anticipating either a stonewall or a confrontation. Back in the day, everyone expected a politician to fudge a bit, skew to his party’s world view and defend his talking points, but this actual lying-out-loud business took us all by surprise.
Then along came Dubby, and by the time we shook off our stupor and became aware that confrontation was vital, nuanced liberal thought fell prey to the sound bite. Sadly, liberals aren’t well-designed for this kind of winner-take-all knife fight; they’re better with twelve rounds and a referee. People who see life in shades of gray are more civil in their speech, more generous in deliberations and less critical of faults than their black ‘n white counterparts. That has made liberals the likely target of a sucker punch from the beginning of time, and traditionally too slow on the up-take, but lately the facts have proven so overwhelmingly contrary to the Republican-approved story line, there’s no way to let the record go uncorrected. At this point in history, any reporters not prepared for confrontation are failing the public (but perhaps not their employers, who haven’t welcomed facts over profit in a couple of decades; if confrontation draws ratings, truth will out, she said, cynically).
Realistically, this confrontation thing isn’t easy for most of us, especially the always-fair, look-at-my-own-culpability-first, spiritually inclined. And when the conversation is turned upside down and inside out, as is most political rhetoric, confusion reigns. It takes a while to work through the bluff and bluster, the deliberate obfuscation and knee-jerk response attached to any issue to get to the core of it, and by that time, either the crisis has been settled or you’re too exhausted to care. Take the business about “forcing” the Catholics to provide birth control for their employees. A simple case of employee rights. No employers get to foist their belief system on those who work for them.
The separation of church and state instituted by the founders protected the government from religious mandates as much as it protected the church from intrusion by the government. Please note that our president — clever, nimble dude that he is — took care of that little dust-up so quickly the Catholic clerics are still wondering if they got enough PR juice out of it to make it worthwhile. Obama cut to the chase, refusing to give the issue time to fester. This contraception stuff is a winner with the Pub base but no one else. That’s just shy of 30% of the population who have already made up their mind about the most hated president in memory. Seems to me that the Pubs’ wholesale war on women is a losing proposition, but they’re short on new tricks in that bag of theirs, aren’t they? Now it’s all about presenting real ideas, and they’re fresh out.
Rather than fess up to their corporate agenda, Boehner and McConnell, Issa and Cantor, offer no toe-hold on reality. And when we are barraged with things that we know are patently untrue, when hypocrisy is spread so thick we can taste it and the prospect looms of a future controlled by determined ideologues eager to shatter what’s left of our fragile social contract, we have no choice but to respond. The good news is, we’re getting better at it.
We must be doing something right lately, because the Pubs let the renewal of the payroll tax cut, along with unemployment extension, go forward without a squall. Are you shocked? I am, and I’m looking closely to see what’s hiding in the cracks of this maneuver. Seemingly chastened by the “news” that Americans don’t appreciate their obstruction, the Pubs stood down without exacting corresponding spending cuts, which means they wiped out billions in reductions that they had previously won. Said one House Rep, a Texan, “In the end House Republicans felt like they were re-enacting the Alamo, with no reinforcements and our friends shooting at us.” Ahhhh, the sweet strains of El Degüello, announcing no quarter. But we can’t relax yet. I don’t believe their ease of acquiescence for a minute. Something’s up.
You just can’t relax with this stuff. I haven’t been completely relaxed since 1999. I dream about this stuff — not apocalyptic road-warrior nightmares, more like filling in the blanks, a subconscious quest for stripping away cumbersome veneers of niceness. Turns out my subconscious is a hard ass. For instance, last week I forced myself to wake up and scribble down a sound-bite collection of bumper stickers for the presidential campaign. Tell me what you think:
Gingrich in 2012: because Dubya wasn’t enough national despair and international embarrassment
Vote Santorum: getting screwed in the boardroom but not in the bedroom
The Romney Ticket: because America’s ready for liquidation
A little sharp, perhaps. Naughty subconscious. Still, until we’ve put a stake through the heart of some of the remaining Republican Bush-era mythology, we can’t relax or let up. Phony climate science showing up in education, funded by the Koch brothers. The rewriting of history, the challenge to Federal law by individual states, the big money PACs threatening this election in ways we can’t even imagine. Even more vital, the need to redefine the very system that has allowed so much corruption and the atrophy of our liberties. From an article on corporate lobbying, this list of vulnerabilities tells the tale:
“… one piece of the larger crisis facing America in 2012: the capture of government — and both major parties — by well-heeled special interests. While we would all like a simple fix, the reality is that the solution is more complex. We must advance a range of reforms: from limiting super PACS, campaign spending and contributions to requiring full transparency of all political spending, including think tanks like these. From blocking the “revolving door” of politicians and K Street, to fixing the gerrymandering of congressional districts. From increasing voter participation to fixing antiquated legislative and election rules like the filibuster and the electoral college.”
It’s not time to relax, but the era of despair is behind us. When most of the nation was captured by Republican rhetoric and tribal drums that kept us scared and angry, that was dark time. This is a time when light is peeking through the clouds. Things are moving along quickly now. The new Pisces energies will pass everything through our hearts, producing a powerful signature of compassion and wisdom. The universe is singing a new song. Perhaps I’ll start writing music at night, instead of bumper stickers. Oh, and about that last, I’ll leave you with another slogan, drifting up from my night musing:
Boycott Quilted Northern and Angel Soft: don’t let the Koch brothers flush democracy
‘Til next time, sweet dreams!

I think (and have been exhorting the Dems to do this) that we liberals need to get really good at the Twiter-like sound bites. I know they make us sound uneducated or sometimes simple but that’s the ONLY message conservative types understand. If we want to get some of them to see things our way, we HAVE to speak to them in their own language. It is the language of threats and fear and distasteful as that is, unless we use their language, they will never listen to anything we have to say.
For example, I once saw Nancy Pelosi stand up and give a long, detailed and educated speech about an issue. I knew all that detail would be lost on most conservatives. She would have been better off stating it in terms which would have made the conservatives see a fearful outcome for themselves.
The FaceBook meme which asked men; “Imagine if every woman you had sex with had to have your baby and YOU had to PAY for that baby? Contraception works for MEN, too.” That is a perfect sound bite which appeals to men’s fears of being made to support every baby they may get on a woman they had sex with. After all, without access to contraception, more of those women would likely have gotten pregnant. Such fears would make them rethink the contraception issue in terms of how it affects THEM.
Instead of saying the GOP is anti-women, say they want to force men to pay for every pregnancy they cause. Instead of saying we want the top 1% to pay their fair share, say the top 1% has ended the American Dream. Always turn each issue around to hit the spot of FEAR the conservatives have over their own place and money. Use their own fear, racism, bigotry, and greed against them. That is their language and we have to use it if we want to make ANY headway with them. It isn’t lying, it is just restating the issue from a simple point of view which will increase the fear of change they already have.
We’re a loophole nation, Brendan — part of our problem. Just tightening up the laws that have been weakened over the years mean examining clusters of laws that impact one another. It will be a process and we need to find some committed, sharp people to engage it.
The Pubs are famous for “I know you are but what am I” retorts, Maria — PeeWee’esque. They project their worst tendencies and most wicked deeds onto their foes, deflecting the heat, and quite successfully I might add. It’s human brain function to lean toward those arguments we agree with … hence the rise of Rush and hate-radio … but the Left can at least entertain two different arguements without a midlife crisis. The Right simply can’t let any light in to their version of how things are [were] because they can’t allow any wiggle room in the conclusions to be drawn.
The Left has traditionally been an opinionated, and infamously undisciplined, conglomerate who are difficult to herd while the Right marches in lockstep. This season, the Right is all over the board and there seems to be NO strong center to adhere to; so much the better for Obama but the hysteria is rising [and you’ll see that in spades if the MittBot doesn’t take Michigan.] So it’s even more vital to the think tanks and talk-shows that they pound out an alternative story they can link the troops back to, even if its untrue. ESPECIALLY if it’s untrue.
Yes be, I’ll keep writing cheeky slogans. And yes, Jann, I’ll keep digging. Thanks to you both for the encouragement. And agreed, e — the divide between the brain patterns of the two parties is wide and widening. What makes the two groups tick is very different. I was thinking how humorless the Right is, the other night, watching one of their people on Bill Maher. Their smiles aren’t genuine, they laugh at mean stuff, racist stuff — stuff that makes me wince. Ann Coulter is their bitch goddess, amusing with viscousness. A Lefty can blend into a Righty group as long as they understand the game at hand, but a Righty just can’t figure out what the hell the Leftys are talking about — and that defines our larger problem.
Thanks for playing this weekend, dearhearts — have a good Presidents Day [instituted back when we had more respect for the office than to shake our fingers in their face!]
“It takes a while to work through the bluff and bluster, the deliberate obfuscation and knee-jerk response attached to any issue to get to the core of it, and by that time, either the crisis has been settled or you’re too exhausted to care.” Even if one is not exhausted, you have been stymied in trying to clear away the obfuscation and the crisis isn’t settled, but it is no longer “newsworthy” and therefore, ignored.
To the suggestions on reforms I would add putting limit on the time for campaigning for the next office, similar to the British system: go back to the constituency for six or eight weeks, campaign, and once the election is over, no more campaigning until the six or eight weeks before the next election. Well, that may be a bit too brief, but jeesh, enough with the three years and eleven months of campaigning for the next four year term.
Thanks ever so much, Jude, for the new bumper stickers. Makes me wanna print them on my own to add to the one in my car: “Stop bitching. Start a revolution.” Uranus-Pluto square: here we come!
Truly, something’s up. Keep digging, Judith – I count on your terrier tendencies to keep on.
JannKinz
please keep telling this story. Something interesting: Had to do a lot of driving over the last week for work, and I scan the right-wing talk shows on the radio. Their tactic now is to say that the left is “rewriting history” and trying to get everyone to swallow a false narrative of the past 10-20 years. Our perspective is that of truths emerging and covers being blown off. But when you can see how that’s being countered, it gives you something to look out for and work with.
Oh Jude, please don’t stop with the bumper stickers yet. They are great, and humor won’t leave us just because there’s lots of Pisces energy now. Poems would be good too! So glad you have taken a step back to give us the long view perspective of these chaotic times. Maybe having Neptune in Pisces will dissolve some of those exaggerated fears the 30% cling to and maybe then they also will see the light peeking through the clouds. Pity the poor corporate stooges when nobody listens to their fear mongering any more. Or not.
be
You touch a fundamental issue on liberalism versus conservatism — two different games, two different sets of rules, pitted against one another. The pen versus the sword.
Thanks, Judith! I’m in complete agreement with on the political/campaign funding issue(s): there are a lot of separate items to clean up and eliminate. Not to mention stress test the solutions: are there any loopholes?