Regrettable: The troubling things I learned when I re-reported Bob Woodward’s book on John Belushi

By Tanner Colby Slate Magazine

[Bob Woodward is one of the most respected journalists in the United States, though there is increasing evidence that he’s become as corrupt as the president he helped take down. This is a deeply troubling article from Slate, distributed by our Political Waves list. The article was originally published in mid-March. — efc]

Belushi on the set of Animal House, 1978. This shirt should be in the Smithsonian.

A little more than a week ago, during an interview with Politico, Bob Woodward came forward to claim he’d been threatened in an email by a “senior White House official” for daring to reveal certain details about the negotiations over the budget sequester. The White House responded by releasing the email exchange Woodward was referring to, which turned out to be nothing more than a cordial exchange between the reporter and Obama’s economic adviser, Gene Sperling, who was clearly implying nothing more than that Woodward would “regret” taking a position that would soon be shown to be false.

A rather trivial scandal, but the incident did manage to raise important questions about Woodward’s behavior. Was he cynically trumping up the administration’s “threat,” or does he just not know how to read an email? Pretty soon, those questions tipped over into the standard Beltway discussion that transpires anytime Woodward does anything. How accurate is his reporting? Does he deserve his legendary status?

I believe I can offer some interesting answers to those questions. Thirty-one years ago, on March 5, 1982, Saturday Night Live and Animal House star John Belushi died of a drug overdose at the Chateau Marmont in Los Angeles—which, bear with me a moment, has more to do with the current coverage of the budget sequester than you might initially think.

Read more