Talking to Thresholders, wearing through the facade

All week we’ve been discussing the idea of a Thresholder in the Daily Astrology space in relation to an aspect with minor planet 1992 QB1 (coverage here and here). Eric’s writing in Planet Waves and Book of Blue has long explored the idea of a Thresholder as one who intentionally holds space to help guide another through deep transitions.

Stanley Siegel, LCSW, recently found out just how taboo it still is to give space to Thresholders -- yet he is continuing to hold space on the Internet for the conversation.
Stanley Siegel, LCSW, recently found out just how taboo it still is to give space to Thresholders -- yet he is continuing to hold space on the Internet for the conversation.

The curious thing is how marginalized such people often are in our society, despite their crucial, central role in helping individual lives to evolve – marginalized even by supposed peers. In fact, a couple months ago one psychotherapist who wrote about Thresholders in an online psychology magazine found himself shoved to the margins of his profession for doing so.

Stanley Siegel is a psychotherapist, author, international lecturer, and former director of education at New York’s renowned Ackerman Institute for Family Therapy. In February he wrote an entry in his blog on Psychology Today‘s website exploring the shared values of sex workers and therapists.

In doing so, he crossed the imaginary line that divides the ‘proper’ healing community from the fuzzy, stigmatized world of sex-workers who provide healing services without credentials after their names. Psychology Today never ran the article – and cancelled his recurring column outright.

You can read Siegel’s article here – it includes anecdotes from his own patients who have benefited deeply from the services of sex workers, plus insights from the sex workers themselves. Unfortunately, therapists cannot actually refer their patients to sex workers at this time – despite the success of sexual surrogates in recent decades. Siegel writes,

In the 1970s, sex researchers Masters and Johnson introduced the idea of using sexual surrogates with patients to engage in intimate sexual relations to achieve a therapeutic goal. The idea caught on for a short time. Sex surrogates were eventually certified to use a combination of techniques — talking, listening and performing to help resolve a patient’s sexual issue. Psychotherapists referred patients to surrogates who had problems with self-confidence, sexual anxiety, premature ejaculation, vaginismus, sexual inhibition and erectile dysfunction.

Despite the high success rate of surrogate programs, complicated legal issues, along with intense criticism from both the far right and feminist organizations, arose. Few states allow sexual surrogates to practice these days.

Did you catch that? Both the far right and feminists closed ranks on these Thresholders. The reaction from the far right is to be expected; that feminist groups would be so anti-sex as to be unable to hold space for alternative forms of sexual healing is dismaying at best. At worst, it shows just how thoroughly we have, as a culture, been turned against ourselves. Even now, in 2012, a respected psychotherapist was thrown off a prominent psychology website for suggesting that some sex workers are able to accomplish with clients what the clinicians cannot.

Read more