Today’s subscriber edition is in subscribers’ inboxes
This is what subscribers saw in their inbox this morning. The rest of the edition includes detailed astrological analysys of the coming seven days, including lots about the sexy stuff going down in Scorpio, as well as the weekly audio and horoscope. All delivered right to your email. Signup info is below. To read the whole issue write to me at dreams@planetwaves.net.
To purchase this issue on its own, complete with the lead article, special astrology sections for the week and Eric’s horoscopes, please click here. Or, you can sign up here for three months to get our twice-weekly mailings, including monthly and weekly horoscopes and articles.
3 thoughts on “Today’s subscriber edition is in subscribers’ inboxes”
Eric,
Thank you. Every week you do it again, better, broader and deeper. From the title of the piece (which sent a chill down my spine), to the wry humor, to yet another brilliant lesson in chart analysis, the lead on this readers edition captures a moment that could easily slip by without its just acknowledgement (which you deliver). One other thing, the recently new format adding the “Sky”, “Emo” “Ero” and political sections is a wonderful stroke of creativity.
Dem Now! has some on-the-street interviews at OWS from this morning, including one with New York City Council Member Jumaane Williams, who “is one of many local officials who have lent their support for the occupation.”
“Speaking from Zuccotti Park in Lower Manhattan, attorney Michael Ratner of the Center for Constitutional Rights says New York City’s efforts to displace Occupy Wall Street protesters in order to clean the park violates their First Amendment rights and would have led to a major confrontation. ‘Apart from the illegality of it, it was just too massive,’ Ratner says. ‘It would have been a bloodbath. The idea that they were going to come in here when there were thousands of people all over the place — union people everywhere — they could not have successfully closed this park down. … It’s too big now. This park is becoming a permanent feature of the next generation of protests.’ Ratner was a co-signer of a letter sent last night from the Occupy Wall Street Legal Working Group to Brookfield Properties, who must maintain the private park for public use, that claimed the enforcement action it requested to New York City in order to clean the park raised serious First Amendment and other legal concerns, and warned that police action in the park without a prior court order would be unconstitutional and unlawful.”
Eric,
Thank you. Every week you do it again, better, broader and deeper. From the title of the piece (which sent a chill down my spine), to the wry humor, to yet another brilliant lesson in chart analysis, the lead on this readers edition captures a moment that could easily slip by without its just acknowledgement (which you deliver). One other thing, the recently new format adding the “Sky”, “Emo” “Ero” and political sections is a wonderful stroke of creativity.
Dem Now! has some on-the-street interviews at OWS from this morning, including one with New York City Council Member Jumaane Williams, who “is one of many local officials who have lent their support for the occupation.”
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/10/14/nyc_withdraws_cleaning_evacuation_order_in
Also:
“Speaking from Zuccotti Park in Lower Manhattan, attorney Michael Ratner of the Center for Constitutional Rights says New York City’s efforts to displace Occupy Wall Street protesters in order to clean the park violates their First Amendment rights and would have led to a major confrontation. ‘Apart from the illegality of it, it was just too massive,’ Ratner says. ‘It would have been a bloodbath. The idea that they were going to come in here when there were thousands of people all over the place — union people everywhere — they could not have successfully closed this park down. … It’s too big now. This park is becoming a permanent feature of the next generation of protests.’ Ratner was a co-signer of a letter sent last night from the Occupy Wall Street Legal Working Group to Brookfield Properties, who must maintain the private park for public use, that claimed the enforcement action it requested to New York City in order to clean the park raised serious First Amendment and other legal concerns, and warned that police action in the park without a prior court order would be unconstitutional and unlawful.”
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/10/14/constitutional_rights_lawyer_michael_ratner_failed
Anybody else notice the “poll” on CNN’s homepage? “Quick vote. Which protest movement do you favor more. Occupy Wall Street or the tea party?”
Really?
And furthermore – How quickly we are asked to take sides.
http://www.cnn.com/
(OK – will read you soon, E. My day has just begun.)