In today’s subscriber mailing, titled Taking a Chance at Being Yourself, Eric wrote of tomorrow’s pivotal New Moon in Aquarius conjunct Mars, “Don’t be surprised if you find yourself feeling rather strongly about an idea you have. Aquarius-styled, that’s going to be an idea about standing out as an individual, something that most of us could do with a little more of.”
We’re all watching events in Egypt closely to see if this New Moon will come with President Mubarak’s official departure from office (in the last two hours, the NY Times has announced Obama’s urging of Mubarak not to run for office again and Mubarak’s subsequent announcement that he will not). But this astrology, obviously being played out in collective political ways, is visible in Egypt in personally political ways as well.
Producer for Democracy Now! Sharif Abdel Kouddous reported today, “And when I came here on Saturday, people were — were just doing chants and marches, but — and you have to understand that people in Egypt have not had an opportunity to voice their opposition for so many years, so many decades. And they’re evolving now [inaudible] street theater. You see now political art. It’s a blossoming of political expression that is happening here. Egyptians are finding themselves.”
I think we often get caught up in thinking we have to find ourselves first in order to be ourselves. But maybe it’s in being ourselves that we find out who we are? And here we have the perfect moment to do just that.
Fe, Belated Happy Birthday!
“Despite efforts of the regime of Hosni Mubarak to forestall it by canceling trains to Cairo and throwing up checkpoints, masses of Egyptians poured into Tahrir Square in downtown Cairo, as well into the downtown of Alexandria, on Tuesday morning. At Twitter, courtesy Google/ phone land line (+16504194196 ), we could read from Sharif Abdel Kouddous of Amy Goodman’s Democracy Now!:
sharifkouddous Sharif Kouddous: “Wow. It’s 10am and already more people in Tahrir than I have ever seen. And there’s more flooding in #Egypt
Other twitter reports say that people are walking in to the capital from the outskirts. There are an estimated 20 million people in the Greater Cairo area, so it would be hard to isolate it! ”
Talking to a friend yesterday ( I had a deadline so was not watching the news at all, when she said there were 2 mil people in Cairo, I had a CLEAR vision of people walking to the capital from all points in the country!)
Thank you, Fe. I listened to live reports in Egypt this afternoon and was awed by the crowd. Many happy solar returns to you. The candles are burning in the window for this crossing.
“You get a sense of what the salon conversations of Marie Antoinette must have been like in 1789.”
Helloooooo, Uranus!
From Juan Cole’s Informed Comment site:
Million-Person Marches and the Army Backs Off
Posted on 02/01/2011 by Juan Cole
Despite efforts of the regime of Hosni Mubarak to forestall it by canceling trains to Cairo and throwing up checkpoints, masses of Egyptians poured into Tahrir Square in downtown Cairo, as well into the downtown of Alexandria, on Tuesday morning. At Twitter, courtesy Google/ phone land line (+16504194196 ), we could read from Sharif Abdel Kouddous of Amy Goodman’s Democracy Now!:
Other twitter reports say that people are walking in to the capital from the outskirts. There are an estimated 20 million people in the Greater Cairo area, so it would be hard to isolate it! The tens of thousands said to be thronging in Egypt’s two biggest cities are attempting, by the sheer force of their people power, to impress on Hosni Mubarak that his government simply cannot survive.
The Egyptian army made clear late Monday afternoon Cairo time that it would not repress peaceful demonstrations. A spokesman read out a statement on television: The military said it was fanning out through the streets to prevent looting and acts of sabotage. It said that the military recognized the legitimacy of the demands of the people and of the demonstrators who are asking for vast political and social adjustments. It said it would “never resort to the use of force against this great people.”
Meanwhile, the newly appointed vice president, Omar Suleiman of military intelligence, offered to open negotiations with the demonstrators.
Some analysts are interpreting these statements as a two-pronged strategy. But I wonder if they do not point to a split in the security forces. Suleiman is from military intelligence, not the regular army. The new prime minister, Ahmad Shafiq, is an officer from the relatively elite and pampered air force (like Mubarak himself).
The statement about not using force on the people came from the regular army, which is made up of a combination of staff officers and thousands of conscripts. Army chief of staff Lt. Gen. Sami Anan (Enan) may have decided to preserve the unity of his branch of the armed forces, the closest to the people, by throwing the other three under the bus.
As a smart Pakistani analyst put it:
Thus, Suleiman’s offer to negotiate is probably a way of trying to keep the newly appointed military cabinet in power, perhaps with an eye to new elections, by reaching out to and perhaps bringing in from the cold at least some of the opposition. Lt. Gen. Anan, in contrast, seems not to care very much whether the Mubarak crew stays in power or not, as long as the institution of the army is safeguarded and law and order can be preserved.
In a mass popular uprising of the sort now ongoing in Egypt, unity of the military and security forces, their backing for the ruler, and willingness to be ruthless, are key to a government remaining in power. This combination of factors was present in Iran in summer-fall, 2009. But the news out of Cairo late Monday and into Tuesday suggests deep divisions and diffidence in the military, which bodes ill for Mubarak.
Meanwhile, opposition leader Mohamed Elbaradei warned Mubarak that he had better flee if he values his life. He said that crowds were no longer simply calling for his resignation, but were beginning to call for him to be put on trial.
I watched some official Egyptian television. It is disgusting, with the same tone and snark of Fox Cable News (which is calling the peaceful demonstrators “rioters.”)
The anchor actually defended the security police for shooting down dozens of people on Thursday and Friday. “What else could they do?” A call came in from someone ranting that it was all a Muslim Brotherhood plot. Another man insisted that a few people in the street did not represent the whole people. You get a sense of what the salon conversations of Marie Antoinette must have been like in 1789.