Dancing With The Distracted

By Judith Gayle | Political Waves

I’ve been hearing a lot of jokes about ADD — Attention Deficit Disorder — in the last few weeks. Either the American public has an advanced case of ADD, unable to process facts or focus on outcomes, or it’s leaning on that as an excuse for having made a series of tantrum-driven political miscalculations that are already having ramifications we’ll regret. You know how this goes: we’re destined to repeat history, even so recent as a few years ago, if we don’t … LOOK! Squirrel!

With apologies to those who actually suffer this disorder, I’d feel better if our recent shift rightward had been produced by such a malady instead of by the weakness of character that seems to drive the cynical, specious tone of our current politics. Tell a lie often enough, it becomes true, and lately, with lightning speed. For instance, it took the public about three weeks to make Sister Palin’s Twitter gaffe, ‘refudiate,’ into an actual word that shows up without quote marks. Within a year or so, no one will question its validity. [This seems to be a morph of ‘refute’ and ‘repudiate’, a newborn cousin of the word ‘ginormous’. -ef]

Speaking of stuff we forget, former Bush henchman, House Leader and money launderer Tom DeLay is back in the news after his brief return to our TV screens in Dancing With The Stars. Tom has been keeping a low profile for a few years now, after spending 20 years rising to power in the House of Representatives only to fall from its heights. Known as The Hammer, a reflection of his cut-throat, arm-twisting style, Tom had his fingers in a financial scheme that turned the Texas House Republican for the first time since Reconstruction, then gerrymandered the districts to see that it remained that way. The gerrymandering was legal; the political money swap wasn’t. He has been found guilty of charges and could face so harsh a judgment as life in prison, although that’s highly doubtful. Here’s a quote from a McClatchy editorial:

“This is an abuse of power,” Tom DeLay said Wednesday after an Austin jury found him guilty of politically inspired money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering. “It’s a miscarriage of justice. I still maintain my innocence. The criminalization of politics undermines our very system.”

It’s odd that he would put it that way, given that criminalization of politics is exactly what the jury said he did.

Mr. DeLay’s defense failed him. How did he defend against the cross-currents of money exchange that bought six pivotal Republican congressmen? According to Tom’s lawyer, DeLay did nothing wrong. He was simply playing politics “as usual.” Tom was simply doing what he did best.

The legal system effectively, if belatedly, policed a corrupt political system in this instance, and kudos to Texas for a rational judgment. Our judicial system is, itself, being pressured and assaulted from the political wing that would make it a lapdog, if possible, but that’s another post. In this instance, at any rate, we have a firm refusal to cave in to the pernicious and dangerously epidemic notion that the Republican way of doing politics is the American way.

The Big Lie — that this government is no good at providing for its citizens — has ultimately convinced the populace not to trust government, which explains the recent vote to punish politicians of every stripe. On the other hand, we haven’t taken the same message about corporate America yet. We continue to back business, promote it as necessary to our continued wellbeing and — even as we roar in anger at Wall Street — pay it lavishly with corporate welfare and tax giveaways.

Some 40% of the population, according to CNN, thinks that the top percentile of wealthy should receive continued tax cuts that will add billions to our debt load, even as the unemployed, over a million, get stiffed. So we don’t trust government but we trust business interests? Really? See, like I said: ADD. We might question the wasteful efficacy of the mammoth privatized government we pay taxes for, recoil at the unvarnished truth of a decades-long plan to steal political power and squash the dreams … LOOK OUT! Squirrel!

mmm, where were we again?

Perhaps in this potent season of whistle blowing and data dumps, we’ll stumble across something to defuse that Big Lie. Something that will blow our socks off, grab us by the nape of the neck and shake us hard; keep our attention long enough to awaken us to the plot to strip public service away and replace it with private profit. Previous news dumps on Iraq gave us a sense of the kind of money frittered away to both potential allies and private contractors. WikiLeaks is giving us a picture of our diplomatic dysfunction and the business concerns that lurk behind the various players. The Fed has had to dump out a record of some 3 trillion bucks worth of activity, thanks to Bloomberg and Bernie Sanders, who have pushed to know who got what in Bush’s banking giveaway of 2008.

If Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, can stay out of jail long enough, it appears his next target is the internal workings of Bank of America, whose stock took a tumble when that news leaked. I’d love to take a peek at that, even though Amazon has apparently caved to big power and disabled WikiLeaks servers. Sunshine or treason, you decide. In an era when citizens of this nation are better off getting news from European providers, Assange feels more like friend than foe.

Perhaps there is no one piece of information that will stun us into action to put the plutocracy in its place, but the totality of the information might weigh us down long enough to actually examine it. While the passions of the culture war trump the drab calculations of the auditor’s pencil, “follow the money” has always been the path back to cause. We now have more than enough material to examine, looking for the hand that opens the wallet and expects that it has bought access to power. Perhaps we’ll even notice that the human cost, to our great shame, is the one least valued.

We have enough information to awaken from the delusion that government will always screw us but corporations are still our warm, fuzzy friends, providing us jobs and trickling down our good. That’s some very expensive, very effective PR, that turns reality on its head so effortlessly. We’ve got to wonder what enormous victimization needs to be perpetrated on us before we stop trusting what Monsanto and Exxon and GE are really doing in our name, and whether we’ll still have time to do anything about it when we notice.

Government does not need more business-types in the administration, as has been declared these last few weeks. It does not need to attempt even more bipartisanship, which means literally caving in to stonewalling Republican solutions to every bill or proposition, pushing the money back up the ladder toward the wealthy. Government needs to draw a line in the sand beyond which it will no longer pay to play. It needs to find its moral center, as Obama does when he brings Colin Powell back into the White House to add credence to the START treaty, encourages the Pentagon to quickly put a DADT repeal together that will satisfy the fusty old McCains of the nation, or sends his party out to pass a tax extension for the middle-class, not the rich, even as the hypocrites on the right yelp that he’s acting ‘in bad faith.’

Government is NOT a for-profit entity. It is a public service entity, disbursing public funds for the betterment of the whole and the benefit of the commonwealth. That may not be the business model developed at one of the many conservative think tanks, but it’s the only one that will stand up to the incoming influx of 21st century energy redefining this nation and this era of human endeavor. “Of, for and by the People,” does not ask how much the people make, what they have or how they vote. That may not be the Tom DeLay way but it’s damned sure the American way.

9 thoughts on “Dancing With The Distracted”

  1. 🙂 Dontcha just love how the world freezes – total focus – when he senses the squirrel? If “time” exists, it most certainly is a variable.

    xo!

  2. OMG — I soooooo love Doug! I truly do. GOD spelled backwards.

    I always keep in mind that at the great separation between mankind and the animal kingdom, dog turned and came back to walk with us dumb humanoids. Their totem is loyalty. Even if they’ve got that squirrel thing going on, they’ve got Heart mastered.

    That was a perfect gift of the day! Bless ye, edgewise.

  3. Carrie,

    Yes, seems to me The answers are (will be) different because the questions are different. At least more of us are beginning to ask different questions.

    And so yes, how WILL life on this planet deal with the toxins.

    Or are our little Alien Bacteria been planted to usurp us if we just keep going past the signs God sends us and we go down writhing? Or maybe that’s the larger pattern, ripple on the pond, that hasn’t faded yet.

    (BTW, “alien” is not a negative connotation to me, nor the idea that new life is sprouting all around us even as we don’t see or acknowlege or look for it. God’n’Good’n’Goddess’n’Love is indeed omnipresent.)

  4. God yes: dioxins and xenoestrogens, plastics, teflon and all the rest have so messed up the human body. We really need to find some way to eat from locally grown, sustainable foods. Yet even that can’t keep the dioxins and other poisons out of our systems completely; they are everywhere.

  5. Thanks for the response, dearhearts — edgewise, Lyshy sounds like an ingredient in a new power-drink. Drink LYSHY to keep sharp longer!

    And Carrie, your point is well taken, especially about the obesity and I found this link applicable, as well. Too many of us aren’t playing with a full deck of brain chemistry and there is obvious, as well as unobvious, consequence: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/judith-j-wurtman-phd/weight-loss_b_790355.html

    In counterpoint, the FDA has THIS radical answer — YIKES! http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/04/fda-we-should-expand-use-_n_792028.html

    Eric’s point is critical, here. Our own food is medicated, franken-ized, irradiated, and nuked before it’s handed to us over the counter — who could miss how this might f/up body chemistry? But then add thousands of unstudied toxins introduced to our environment since mid-century [last] and that becomes a cell-morphing, metabolism-crunching puzzle it will take scientists generations to backtrack.

    As regards this post, I think the Republicans Achilles Heel is that they’ve believed their own bullshit. DeLay is the obvious example, making little attempt to defend what he thought was perfectly normal. Bobo [Brooks,] the Casper Milquetoast of the conservative movement, made a point worth noting, here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/03/david-brooks-republicans_n_791281.html

    Essentially, they really REALLY believe their demonized version of liberalism. That puts absolutely NO emotional stop-gaps between them and the extremists which will ultimately backfire with a growingly suspicious America who knows bat-shit crazy when they see it.

    Spiritually, we’re in that space where we’re growing past the need to be led; some would say herded. Me, for instance. On the other hand, those who refuse to open to their own strength and discernment will continue to look to be told what to do. Enter the corrupt authority figures — and that’s where we are. Punishment is how we roll, on every conceivable level which is why we all run from accountability and give our power away to guilt. Manipulation is effortless in that scenario.

    It seems to me that a big portion of this leap we’re taking is refreshing our ideas about God/dess, however we call or think about that. The authoritarian patriarchal model really has had its day and bringing back the balanced yin/yang version of our Higher Vision creates everything differently, if we’ll allow. It’s not news — 2000 years ago the Christ-energy replaced the old model with Love. We’re just late to the party.

  6. I would add, Carrie, that the real-world loss in buying power created by taxes, inflation and wages that don’t keep up with the costs of living, is compensated for by most people with credit cards and other forms of borrowing. And yes, the message is still buy, buy, buy — because without that we don’t have a consumer economy — the only kind we consumers know of in the United States.

    As for obesity, scientists are trying to figure out why many wild critters, who don’t eat corn syrup, are also getting obese; and I don’t mean house cats. In a comment connected to the Assange piece several posts down, I refer to the dioxin coverup, and I would say that dioxin-like compounds are the first candidate to look at for a cause; what all living things have in common is exposure to these chemicals, which are both endocrine and metabolic poisons.

    High fructose corn syrup is a problem, particularly when you consider that 40% of the caloric intake of Americans, on average, comes from this one product; dioxin is a bigger problem.

  7. We have to stop and look at the mixed message we have been getting that plays on our collective guilt. That message is one in which no matter what we the people do, we are guilty of something. On the one hand, we are told that Americans “spend beyond their means, owe too much in debt, and don’t save enough.” On the other hand, we are told “buy, buy, buy” because “buying stimulates the economy and creates jobs.” So no matter what we do, we are guilty. If we stop consuming and start living within our means and saving, we are “ruining the economy by creating a recession which will mean loss of jobs” but if we keep consuming, we are “living beyond our means in greedy, gluttonous consumption that gets us into debt.” See? The plutocracy has it so that no matter what we do, WE are in the wrong. Who benefits in this? Certainly not us and definitely not our planet or our children.

    Same goes for food and obesity. The food industry added high fructose corn syrup which, like those special chemicals in tobacco, causes us to become addicted to it and makes us fat. Sure we could eat less or better but low-pricing convenience foods, working us more hours than ever, adding in things to make us fat and addicted gets us what? Obesity, which creates a huge market for diet and health stuff. The food, pharma and medical industries don’t want us to eat healthy or be healthy because they would LOSE trillions of dollars if we were.

    Dumb down education to the point that people are ignorant of these things (and not likely to question) and we get an ignorant population who is incapable of making good choices that would serve US instead of serving the market greed.

    We do have some responsibility in this, but it is far less than the plutocracy would have us believe.

  8. Yes, we seem to be doing more of a reverse sky-is-falling routine than anything — the crumbles of our non-choices are begining to pelt us, but we’re too lie-shy to look up and see if it’s really starting to rain.

    Thanks, Jude.

    PS I’m thinking we should add lie-shy to the Webster’s or maybe the Twitter Dictionary of American Speak. Oh wait, that’s Lieshie? nonon…Lyshy? um….oh never mind. we’ll havta ask Sarah.

Leave a Comment