Our Aquarian Era: Where Are We Headed?

Editor’s Note: This started as an open letter to customers of my An Aquarian Era readings, which are running a little late. Thank you for your many, many warm responses.

Dear Friend and Reader:

It occurred to me this might be a good place to discuss some of my thoughts about what is happening in Aquarius, and get your feedback from your own perspective as well. I am interested, because this is troubling me, and I want to give a clear and refined message to my readers — one that is honest and realistic.

I am wrestling with this problem of the Aquarian Era every day right now. I define this as Jupiter and Saturn in Aquarius, soon to be followed by Pluto in Aquarius (starting in 2023).

I don’t mean to sound overly dramatic, though neither world events nor the astrology that influences us are casual affairs for me, certainly not now.

We keep hearing what an extraordinary time of history this is, without recognizing what an understatement that is. We think it’s for one reason, but it’s really for another.

Since we are the group that is taking an interest in the Aquarian question, and you’re expecting some writing from me, maybe this is a good place to take it up. I want to talk about the central issue of the Aquarian Era. I have addressed this in the six signs (completed) of An Aquarian Era, though this is closer to the heart of the matter. In those essays, here is what I am getting at.

Every sign has its public and private manifestations, and then its known expression and what we call the ‘shadow’ side. I have seen that the shadow side and the public manifestation are often closely related. People tend to behave differently in groups than they do as individuals.

In the collective sense, to which we are all subject, Aquarius covers two main topics: energy patterns that lead to social patterns; and science and technology, which also lead to social patterns. If you look back over the past year of events, it is social patterns that have come under the hammer the most. If American society cannot gather for Thanksgiving dinner, or if the old folks are told to stay home, something is seriously wrong.

Let’s break this down.

I am learning the history of science as passed from Aristotle to Kepler, Copernicus, Galileo, Sir Isaac, Einstein and the quantum physicists looking at particles of atoms. It is incredible how much work they do to prove or disprove their theories.

Killing my Television — And Studying Physics

First one point of background. I have killed my television — that is, got rid of commercial TV, saving the company $1,200 a year and stemming the today wave of advertising. I did this soon after I discovered that tucked way in the back of Amazon Prime are hundreds of physics lectures, which address the nature of time, light, gravity, astrophysics and quantum theory (all of which are closely related).

I am not entirely new to these topics, so I am getting plenty out of these courses. My particular approach to astrology includes lots of astronomy. I’ve now watched about 50 lectures by three different professors so far.

Physics is a branch of science that allows for what seems like wild theorization, but which demands mathematical and observational confirmation of those theories if they are to be taken seriously. There are standards of establishing the truth as known so far, as our understanding of reality transforms over the centuries.

I am learning the history of science as passed from Aristotle to Kepler, Copernicus, Galileo, Sir Isaac, Einstein and the quantum physicists looking at particles of atoms. It is incredible how much work they do to prove or disprove their theories.

These are empirical scientists, whose papers are out there for others to tear down; for others to succeed with better theories and better experiments. This is hard work, and it has proceeded over many centuries and is still going on.

We have this idea that all of science works with this depth of commitment and ethics, but sadly, I have seen many times covering the history of science (particularly the chemical industry) that this is not so. In modern society, the government and the drug developers and chemical developers work together, often resulting in poisoning the public.

Here is an article I wrote about that a few years ago. The article describes the chart of a total failure of the system that regulates pesticides, industrial chemicals, food additives and cosmetic ingredients. It is based on the transcript of a secret meeting between government and industry obtained under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). It is worth reading as a critical point of background about whether the FDA is trustworthy.

I am currently banned from Facebook for 30 days for discussing my safety concerns. Nearly everyone raising safety concerns is being “deplatformed.” This gives the idea that there is just one side to the story, and makes everyone else skittish about saying anything.

‘Believing in Science’

I hear lot of people today say they believe in science, as if it were Santa Claus or unicorns. Many go further and accuse those who ask questions of being conspiracy theorists. But science is not about belief. It is also not about the opinion of an alleged scientist. Science is about the the gathering and study of empirical data that is the result of careful observation and analysis. But that is not the public perception now. The public perception is that those who want to see the data are somehow “anti-science.”

With this combined topic, we have the two public elements of Aquarius intersecting: group think, and the use of science and technology.

We now have a cult of science that believes in the Dear Leader and never, ever looks at the data. Those who look at the data are going against the Dear Leader (whomever he or she may be that week, or some phantom Grand Deacon of the Scientists).

Two candidates are American astrologers Rob Brezsny and Steven Forrest. Neither has science training or journalism experience. I hear that both are fantastic guitar players. Both have massive audiences. And both are telling their readers every day to get the Covid vaccine, because science says they should.

We have been tracking this issue daily now for 13 months. It is not so simple. I have been researching issues with injections since I first became aware of the problems in the mid-1990s.

When I challenged Steve on vaccine safety data (part of the scientific process), and the ethics of not warning his followers that there are people who medical science says should never be injected (those whose siblings have had reactions to vaccines, and those with certain diseases that could cross react to the substance), he banned me from his Facebook page.

This is going on a lot. I am currently banned from Facebook for 30 days for discussing my safety concerns. Nearly everyone raising safety concerns is being “deplatformed.” This gives the idea that there is just one side to the story, and makes everyone else skittish about saying anything. (See this new report from the Center for Digital Hate, calling for the deplatforming of anyone who dares to question a “scientist” or the “scientific” narrative.) This is not a robust debate over the issues or public policy.

This is a scientific issue, a medical issue and an ethical issue. Here we have two public figures to whom people are accustomed to listening (and not questioning), giving out medical advice, without data, without medical credentials, and illiterate on the issues, then set an example by banning a dissenter. This seems, however, to have had a spawning effect, as now many people are speaking up, asking questions and challenging the morality of their position.

I think we need to be prepared for what to do if this becomes a problem. And that might not happen for a few years, as subtle problems manifest — and most will not be connected with the injection. This is a standard tactic of industry: it happened so long ago, nobody will make the connection.

Free Donut Every Day for the Rest of the Year!

Last week, Steve posted to his Facebook that if you bring your vaccine card to a Krispy Kreme donut shop, you will get a free donut every day for the rest of the year. Here is a screen shot of the post. This may be well intentioned. But it is not science. (From the company’s point of view, it’s self-serving, as nobody walks out of a donut shop with just a donut. It is however using the claim of science to pressure or bribe people to do something that they might not do if they understood the science.

Steve also said, “When in doubt, do what the Dalai Lama does,” posting a photo of the fellow allegedly getting jabbed. And people are cheering him on; they are treating him like an oracle. The donut is a sugar high or murder attempt; the Dalai Lama is the appeal to authority fallacy that got us into this mess in the first place.

But the one thing this is not, is science. Of course, the “easiest” way to take part is to not understand the science. What exactly is messenger RNA? What happens when you inject synthetic mRNA into your body? I mean, what happens in 25 years?

And if you go for the other shot, who exactly is Johnson & Johnson? They are the same people who left asbestos in their talcum powder for generation after generation and were finally forced to pay out damages of $4.69 billion by a jury in 2018 for giving many, many people cancer with their innocent-seeming baby powder. Then, a few months later, they withdrew their talc from the market. How quickly we forget that this is the state of what we call science.

So yes, this has now been reduced to “get a free donut.” The pressure is on everyone in some way to take this injection and I know many of you already have. I do not mean to cause you anxiety. I do think that anxiety will become a serious issue as problems with this rushed preparation come to light. This has happened twice before in American history. But the injection was never messenger RNA, the very thing that our genetic code uses to communicate with itself.

I think we need to be prepared for what to do if this becomes a problem. And that might not happen for a few years, as subtle problems manifest — and most will not be connected with the injection. This is a standard tactic of industry: it happened so long ago, nobody will make the connection.

Today, we have an issue with what we call science and how it is used to pressure people into doing something that they don’t understand — which they might not do if they understood it. This is very much an issue of Aquarius as that sign addresses both science AND how the public is pressured out of its individuality, into a tribal state, with threats of excommunication and revocation of citizen privileges, if we do not comply — with science that is not science by the definition OF science.

Is there even a pandemic? How would we know? We have new hospital data from New York State we can look at.

The most important thing Prof. Melendy indirectly admitted to me is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been sequenced from an intact virion. He explained that it was being assembled from nucleotides (protein fragments said to be from viruses) “like pages from a book.” This may sound good, but it reveals a problem I’ve reported many times: nobody has purified isolate.

A Virologist Speaks: Hospital Admission Rates and ICU Capacity

Over the summer, I was instructed by Tom Melendy, a professor of virology at SUNY Buffalo (my alma mater and a major research institution), that you must look at ICU capacity and hospitalization rates as your bottom line for knowing whether there is a pandemic. He is a vaccine designer, not some guy giving his opinion on YouTube.

There are two main sides in this whole debate, to the extent that anyone knows it’s happening in an environment of censorship: the people who are all-in on vaccines and viruses, and the skeptics (usually) of both.

Last July, Prof. Melendy gave me two-and-a-half hours of his time, explaining the official government/corporate scientific position. This was an incredibly valuable, enlightening interview that opened many doors. I did not record it; I typed notes the old-fashioned way.

It was essentially an “ask me anything” session. I had a lot to ask. Part of our discussion included his take on why SV-40, the carcinogenic monkey virus that was in hundreds of millions of polio vaccines, was not more effective at causing cancer. (He explained his theory of cross immunity created by the infamous J-C and B-K viruses, which 80% of us are said to have antibodies for. If he is correct, this makes a strong case for natural immunity.)

The most important thing Prof. Melendy indirectly admitted to me is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been sequenced from an intact virion. He explained that it was being assembled from nucleotides (protein fragments said to be from viruses) “like pages from a book.” This may sound bookish, but it reveals a problem I’ve reported many times: nobody has purified isolate, meaning, a measurable sample of actual virus, such as taken from human spooge, snot or the like. If they did, they would not be assembling random fragments of protein. Rather, they would be sequencing wild, live virion. But they don’t have clinical samples. What is being used, for all purposes, in the words of CDC, is a mimicked human specimen.

That is another way of saying they have no samples. Now, how is that even possible? How is it possible that the federal government claims that more than 500,000 Americans have died, but there is no purified isolate? There are scientific papers that claim that there has been purified isolate made. But show me the paper and I will show you the problem. The definition of “purified isolate” was changed to something more resembling of bat soup. This is not chemistry set level science, but it’s not so complicated.

Plug and play? Technology platform? Operating system in a computer? Are you effing kidding me? Are humans now devices? Well, this is one giant leap toward getting all people onto the Internet of Things.

Current Numbers from New York City, and Upstate

Let’s look at the numbers from New York that I got from the governor’s office, since I am on their press list. Then we will talk about Pluto and I will leave you to your day.

In New York, a third of hospital and ICU beds are available. Two in 10,000 people are said to be hospitalized for Covid. Here are the numbers, right from the source. The word “pandemic” means “incident to the whole people or region.”

Two in 10,000 people does not sound like the whole people. It sounds more like a rare childhood disease. Further, this is based on a test that is not validated, that would never stand up in court and that even The New York Times admits throws back 90% false positives.

Why is this acceptable to anyone? Are we that in love with being afraid? Is it that easy to fool people?

This morning I was watching Prof. Steve Gimbil lecture on the need for empiricism in science, and the extent to which the theories of physics are inextricably bound to their data. And I started thinking about these numbers, and the problems with the test, which I spent a year of my life documenting.

Prof. Gimbil noted that the mathematical models used by physics must square against measurable reality. the math must work out. We have not seen that: for example, the epidemiological models of Neil Ferguson at Imperial College have always been wrong. But he was taken seriously in early 2020, predicting megadeath on a scale that never came close to happening.

What we are seeing is not science — but it is claimed to be science, and it is being abused to terrify the population, and to get millions of people to do something that is not necessary. Even if there is a virus, if most people understood that only 2 in 10,000 people are hospitalized in New York and that 90% of them may be categorized by a test that says they have a disease they do not have, I think they would think again.

Then, you can read — again, from the source — that the injection is akin to a computer operating system being injected into millions and millions of people. This is to allay their fears or so they can get a free donut. These are the official words of the federally-funded entity known as Moderna:

Plug and play? Technology platform? Operating system in a computer? Are you effing kidding me? Are humans now devices? Well, this is one giant leap toward getting all people onto the Internet of Things. I am aware I may never see the inside of an airplane, Madison Square Garden or my neighborhood bar again, as they all start to demand vaccine cards. I don’t even want my refrigerator on the Internet of Things. I certainly don’t want to be there myself.

What happens when we take the planet of “do or die” and combine it with the sign of technology and mass/group consciousness? Do we even care about the future enough to care about this? Or do we want to get the donut, be like the Dalai Lama and be able to go to a concert? What medical experiment is too high of a cost?

Jupiter and Saturn in Aquarius Now, Pluto in 2023

All of this is happening under Jupiter and Saturn in Aquarius. This is supposed to be the friendly part of the Aquarian Era, the time when we can sort all of this out. It’s the time when under the guidance of Saturn (a benefic planet, when in Aquarius) we learn what we need to know about two things: being ourselves, and the true nature of science. Now is the time we’re supposed to learn how to ask questions and not to believe lies.

Jupiter is also here to help: to expand our knowledge and bring us together — and teach us to be individuals. I would remind you of something I learned from Alice A. Bailey. Aquarius is the sign of groups. But a group is an assembly of individuals who can think for themselves. Anything else is a mass, like the crowd at a football game.

Individuality is very, very difficult to attain, and it is hard work. We have help from Chiron in Aries, though that is the double edge of individuality vs. the false individuality of identity politics, which is the new dumpster fire of our time. I have written many times: we must get it right now, because Pluto is coming.

If we do not wake up now, Pluto in Aquarius is likely to push this transhumanism thing (the merging of humans with computers, computer code, or digital ‘interfacing’) past anything we might have imagined, except in an episode of Black Mirror which addresses the worst possibilities of the digital age. It makes The Matrix look like Dr. Seuss. In fact, one of the mRNA vaccine manufacturers says we are being injected with an operating system; a software platform so we can become plug and play — their words not mine.

What happens when we take the planet of “do or die” and combine it with the sign of technology and mass/group consciousness? Do we even care about the future enough to care about this? Or do we want to get the donut, be like the Dalai Lama and be able to go to a concert? What medical experiment is too high of a cost?

And how exactly did we get here? Well, I’ve been covering that for years, in my articles about what digital consciousness is doing to us. It is putting us into an anesthetized stupor. It is pushing us out of our bodies. It is turning society into tribal insanity.

At the end of his life, Carl Sagan said in an interview, “We’ve arranged a society on science and technology in which nobody understands anything about science and technology, and this combustible mixture of ignorance and power sooner or later is going to blow up in our faces.”

Deep Disorientation of Intellect

I have quoted Eric McLuhan many times, and will continue to do so:

“The body is everywhere assaulted by all of our new media, a state which has resulted in deep disorientation of intellect and destabilization of culture throughout the world. In the age of disembodied communication, the meaning and significance and experience of the body is utterly transformed and distorted.”

For those of you who follow astrology, my purpose of the Aquarian Era readings is preparation for when Pluto arrives, and turns up the heat, and even more deeply drives people out of their individuality and into what Alice Bailey calls mass consciousness.

You are not a bee living in a hive. You are not a member of a religious cult. As far as I am concerned, you are a sovereign citizen of the world with natural rights and autonomy over your body.

At the end of his life, Carl Sagan said in an interview, “We’ve arranged a society on science and technology in which nobody understands anything about science and technology, and this combustible mixture of ignorance and power sooner or later is going to blow up in our faces. I mean, who is running the science and technology in a democracy if the people don’t know anything about it.”

Well, now you know a little more, but we still have a lot to learn — and we need to care.

Thanks for reading. You may reply directly.

Faithfully, on a rainy Sunday morning in upstate New York,

Preorder Taurus Astrology Studio 2021-22

Preorder Now at Lowest Price. Price Increases Soon!

Welcome back to Planet Waves. We are presenting the monthly horoscopes in a new format this month, one sign per page. Your page includes monthly readings back to the beginning of the year. All free readers get a few clicks. To get unlimited access to all signs, weekly and monthly horoscopes, and thousands of articles, all you need is a basic membership. These readings are for your Sun, Moon and rising signs. If you don’t know your other signs, please write to us at cs@planetwaves.net and we will help you. — The Planet Waves Editors.

Aries	Taurus	Gemini	Cancer
Leo	Virgo	Libra	Scorpio
Sagittarius	Capricorn	Aquarius	Pisces