PCR Greatest Hits

Below is a collection of articles, stories, and primary source documents that cast doubt on the validity of the Polymerase Chain Reaction test and its purported capability to diagnose cases of Covid-19.


We Must Demand the Truth about Covid-19 by Eric Francis| July 22, 2020

This article is a summary of the issues, including the most important of all: the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) digital test that is creating the illusion of a pandemic at this late date. If you are wondering how the two lines on this graph can diverge so widely, that’s an easy mystery to solve: the polymerase chain reaction can get any result that the lab wants, based on how many cycles the test is left on for. This issue is so glaring, even The New York Times was forced to do the story. Funny, they already did it in 2007, as you will read in my article linked from the headline above.

Relevant articles and documents:

Outbreaks of Respiratory Illness Mistakenly Attributed to Pertussis — New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Tennessee, 2004–2006 | CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, August 24, 2007

Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t | The New York Times, Jan. 22, 2007

Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be. | The New York Times, August 29, 2020


Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus? | Celia Farber, UncoverDC, April 27, 2020

Celia Farber, journalist who covered the HIV/AIDS issue mentioned above, recounts interview with Kary Mullis, and brings up the issue of The Gold Standard.


Corona: creating the illusion of a pandemic through diagnostic tests by Jon Rappoport | March 30, 2020

An early article by investigator Jon Rappoport who demonstrated that the CDC and WHO’s own official literature says that PCR does not diagnose for the disease.

Documents referenced:


Information directly from Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR

A chapter on the invention of PCR from Dancing Naked in the Mind Field written by Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR:

Gary Null, Ph.D. interviews Kary Mullis on whether or not HIV is the probable cause of AIDS: