Does GO Explain Covid Symptoms And Injection Toxicity By Itself?
“Spanish researchers put the Pfizer vaccine under an electron microscope and found it contains 99% graphene oxide and hardly anything else.
There is practically NO evidence that this “vaccine” is gene therapy. There is ZERO genetic material: mRNA or DNA or spike protein. It means this “vaccine” has nothing to do with a so-called virus. This product wasn’t developed to avoid an infection caused by a virus. The true purpose of this product remains hidden. (above from FB via Farber article)
On the wide-ranging toxic destructions of graphene, this article from 2016 in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, spells it out very clearly, and alarmingly.
The Fifth Column: Both The Plan And The Defense Becoming Clear
Graphene oxide nanoparticles act as nanobiosensors once they are installed in neurons which will serve both to be read by and lit up to neuromodulate our behavior, emotions and feelings through an AI network. This is the mechanics of the transhuman agenda.
Once the graphene oxide enhanced brains are lit up, their behaviors will be blamed on a new variant as the justification for more booster injections of GO because as a heavy metal, we can eliminate it over time.
La Quinta Columna: ‘98% to 99% of the vaccination vial is graphene oxide’
Richard Delgado to talk show host Jose Javier Esparza: “This is a phenomenon of electromagnetic induction in the metal that adheres near the inoculation area. In addition, we have found that the magnetism then moves towards the head. And this is very important. Surely for the purpose they may seek. In addition, a potential difference is measured with a multimeter: the person becomes a superconductor. That is, it emits and receives signals. And when we found the materials that can cause this type of alterations in the body, we began to talk about graphene. We suspected it was graphene oxide since it had all the characteristics that magnetized people expressed after inoculation. “
La Quinta Columna comments on the mysterious patent that attempts to normalize the use of graphene oxide as a carrier in vaccine. JULY 12, 2021
But I do not know what is more serious: If the fact that they tell us that there is no graphene oxide in the vaccines when there is a preliminary report by a professor of a public university in Almeria describing that they do have graphene oxide —I do not know if that is more serious— or that later they themselves publish, using the Google tool, a patent to give credibility to the standardization of graphene oxide, and that they did it last night.