Dear Friend and Reader:
The owner of the building where I live (my “landlady,” in common parlance) contacted me by text on Tuesday, shaken up and asking me to watch a video. While she worries a lot, she’s not usually so chatty, so I watched it. It turned out to be about the technology that could potentially move a hurricane around.
Since Helene struck Florida two weeks ago, the “geoengineered storm” concept has been a hot topic. This is not the first time the discussion has come up, though it seems to be getting some traction now. By now, I mean in the post-covid, hyperparanoid, transhuman and trans everything else version of the digital environment, where nothing is true and everything is possible and it’s always the worst thing that is real.
In our moment, the discussion of chemtrails and their background topic — the intentional modification of the weather, or geoengineering — has picked up speed. Following my policy of giving opinions only where I have either a strong factual background or direct witnesses, I can confirm that there is a high probability that attempted weather modification happening.
Note, I follow this issue somewhat, but I’ve never focused on it. The problem is reliable sourcing of information.
The Mythology of Storms
When people experience a storm, it’s often said to be the worst one ever – a story for the grandkids. (Tell that to victims of the Great Red Spot on Jupiter.) Storms have been mythologized for as long as storms and myths have existed — they have been made into legend. There’s a very famous flood in The Bible. Nobody has any photos, but people still talk about it on Sundays.
Also now there are no snowstorms. There is only the imminent “snowpocalypse.”
Also bear in mind that we are suffering from a case of Atlantisitis, which is the inflammation of the idea that humanity will destroy itself with its own technology. In fact, this is happening. However, the thing being destroyed is not buildings or infrastructure. It’s not about the environment.
It’s about our connection to ourselves. This is a spiritual issue.
That said, nature still exists. And we have access to our humanity. Many significant storms have reached North America within living memory, and there are some exceedingly famous ones from times more remote. It’s just that now, everything is amplified, by both End Times thinking, the internet and where the two multiply one another.
When a butterfly flaps its wings in Texas, people in Montana see a picture of it on Instagram five minutes later, which means the world is ending because a giraffe and a goat have become friends (interspecies relating). The same is true when someone makes up a fake picture of the butterfly, or the goat and the giraffe.
When I was small enough to walk holding my grandma Mary’s hand, she would take me to a place near Sheepshead Bay, where a storm had torn up a concrete walkway that she referred to as the Esplanade.
We would have to step over large blocks of concrete, each of which must have weighed a ton or so; these had been uprooted, upended and scattered randomly along the former path of the walkway by the storm. Her point was, observe how powerful nature is. Both she and my mom taught me great respect for the ocean. For many people today, the sea is a lovely thing they have on their desktop photo.
Several times I’ve gone looking for where that was, and what storm it was. It could not have been Hurricane Camille (my mother’s name). That one was in 1969, when I was five, and didn’t come near New York City. (It may have been Hurricane Donna, 1960, but that’s an educated guess.)
I went looking again last night for that storm, assuming it might have been in the 1950s. I started with the Wikipedia list of United States hurricanes.
While I was grousing around, I found an article in the Staten Island Advance that said, “Before Sandy the hurricane of 1950 was ‘the worst storm we ever had’.” Cue to a photo of a city bus in the wrong place. But that storm — legendary as it may be in Staten Island — did not make Wikipedia’s list. Staten Islanders would not be shocked; they get left out of the discussion a lot.
Maybe It’s Like Judo
Let’s come back to the matter of whether you can move a hurricane around, and therefore use it as a weapon. Just remember, this whole notion is based on forgetting how powerful hurricanes have always been.
I’m looking around for official data on how much energy a hurricane contains. One government website says 1.5 trillion watts — the world’s entire generating capacity for a year. Another puts it at “6.0 x 10^14 Watts or 5.2 x 10^19 Joules/day! This is equivalent to about 200 times the total electrical generating capacity on the planet.”
That’s a lot of juice, and presumably it would take a lot to move such a thing around. That energy would have to come from somewhere. However, maybe it’s done like judo, where the energy of the adversary is used to move his body around using minimal force.
Another person pointed me to the documentary Frankenskies, which is mostly about weather modification. Assuming some of this is true, I didn’t know the program was so complex.
But what I know a personally, from my teacher Joseph Trusso, is that there was a weather modification program tested during the Vietnam War. When he was younger, he was an investigative reporter. He did one article covering the topic for Long Island Newsday, called “A Weather Arsenal.”
I don’t have the article handy. He said it was his last for that newspaper. What I remember is that it relied on a computer called ILIAC IV, the world’s first computer to employ a large number of processors to work in parallel with one another. It was located in Ames, Iowa.
According to Joe and his article, there was only one factor interfering with the ability to do weather modification better: computer bandwidth. And that is the one thing we now have in seemingly infinite abundance.
But there is something else: a lot of conspiracy theories are based on the assumption that the government can do (not fake, but do) anything to anyone at any time.
An Astrological Theory — but a Digital Theory First
Between 2001 and 2011, I developed an astrological theory of potential false flag events, as there had been so many of them. The article is called Here at the Edge of the World. You may remember it.
However, astrology is relevant in context, and we must look at the context where this is happening: and that is the trillion-watt phantasm known as the digital environment.
This is the place where everything is fake, and therefore everyone assumes everything else is fake. The “deep fake singularity” This Is Not Morgan Freeman and the original AI-generated SARS-CoV-2 “virus” known as MN908947 have shocked people considerably.
Today we live in a world where, for some, neither the Beatles nor the Rolling Stones wrote any of their own music, Prince Charles is a vampire, Michelle Obama (and many other women) are really men, the Earth has been swallowed by a black hole, and the world is not only flat but the entire universe orbits around us, and we live on a stationary plane, not a globe.
It’s true that there is a lot of bullshit out there. There are historical events that are extremely well accepted, but when you look closely, you come up short on facts and long on questions. That is, if you look, and if you care to know. It’s much easier to think the Moon landing was a hoax without understanding why it might be one.
Digital is a Simulacrum
Yet it’s important to remember our context: we are living in the digital world, which is in fact a simulacrum — a word that in its current form goes back to 1805, with roots into the late 14th century(!). This is not a new idea, but we are drowning in digital right now, and the message of the enveloping medium is “nothing is real.” But if that is true, as John Lennon allegedly did not write, there’s nothing to get hung-up about.
I’m amazed how quickly people go from “that happened” to “that is totally fake,” and instantly from zero to “that guy is a total expert” when he is obviously full of shit. But it’s OK as long as he supports your point of view. Mmm hmmm.
One thing I’ve noticed doing my job is that people are lazy thinkers. They act like they lack the ability to think something through and come up with an original conclusion, when in fact they demonstrate truly incredible knowledge of baseball, building ships in bottles, the nuances of cryptocurrency and nonconvertible debentures, and can name every battle of the Civil War. But they can’t evaluate a statement by a public health official, or read a food package?
Digital makes people even lazier thinkers. Only get a Substack account and you too can be an expert in everything. What is amazing is the utter certainty that some of these people have about their chosen issue. Then they cannot answer a basic question about a solar eclipse.
And there is no self-awareness they might be in some kind of personal spiritual crisis that is affecting their perception of reality — even if they are a psychiatrist.
Betelgeuse: Rare Engines of War
Between 2001 and 2011, a series of news events had charts that all activated the next-to-last degree of Gemini. What these had in common was the potential for being a false flag event, which means an event blamed on the wrong person or thing. (For example, Arab terrorists lurking in caves blew up towers in New York City.)
In fact, Sept. 11 was the first event I discovered with this marker — the Moon in late Gemini (in degree 29). The article is called Here at the Edge of the World. I cover quite a bit about the nuclear problem, which I also develop in the article Notes from Downwind. I cover the Indonesian Banda Aceh earthquake and tsunami of 2004 (the Sumatra quake), as well as Fukushima (all of which I covered at the time of their occurrence, hence I saw the pattern). The Titanic sinking also fits the schema.
Doing this article, I probed into the possibility that earthquakes could be made by technological means. The U.S. government admits this can be done, then says that only immoral countries with huge budgets (like Cuba) would do something terrible like that.
Here is the upshot of my article, which you can read for yourself: in many charts of major events, something important (like the Moon) is conjunct the fixed star Betelgeuse. William Lilly himself (author of the first astrology book in English) says this star is associated with “rare engines of war.”
In the article, I wrote: “When I read the phrase ‘rare engines of war’, I suddenly felt like I was sitting in the middle of someone else’s war. The question is: whose war, and over what?”
At the time, I did not understand how scarce resources were becoming, and there were no plans for 15 minute cities, which many think involve getting rid of the prior city in the same place. The theory about why this stuff is happening is all about the commandeering of land and rare-Earth materials, which is always the motive for war.
The Charts for Helene and Milton are Inconclusive
The charts for Helena and Marvin making landfall are inconclusive. I will devote some time to them in a special STARCAST, above. Helena has Neptune exactly square Betelgeuse from Pisces, and Atlantis square it from Virgo (just over one degree).
That is interesting. Marvin just has Neptune in place. Both have many other factors that describe storms and, that I can see, no direct markers of intent.
While we’re mulling these over, it’s essential to remember that the ultimate geoengineering is what humans do to the planet even on a good day — all the time. Part of the hurricane problem involves the paving over of paradise, which prevents the ground from absorbing water.
Second, it’s easier to believe something than it is to figure it out.
This article is coming out on Oct. 10, 2024. I have been working on the false flag topic of mundane astrology since TWA Flight 800 fell into the Long island Sound in 1996 — that is, for 28 years. I have cast many hundreds of public event charts, and I scrutinize them all for the mark of blaming the wrong entity (false flag).
I’m not in a rush to conclude anything, and have nothing special to prove. As an astrologer, it’s allegedly bad for business if I admit that the astrology on these storms is inconclusive. Many readers would love if I placed blame. The evidence is not there, in these cases. I will keep looking at these charts; sometimes they offer their secrets reluctantly.
I’m aware of the deeper problem: the deception of belief. By that I mean the confusion of knowledge and understanding with simply accepting something as true. I admit, belief is easier, and it’s convenient — and it’s dangerous, because people seem to not be aware of when they are doing it.
I am also cautious of those who must always, always be living in a world where all-powerful evil is waiting to strike at humanity. Whether or not this is true, it won’t help you get through the day.
This is all evidence of a deeper issue, so far nameless, that is calling out for attention and healing.
With love,
