Astrology for the Masses
March 3, 2006
http://cainer.com/ericfrancis/mar3.html
Dear Eric,
Hello. My name is Kristen. I met you many years ago in
Thank you Kristen
Dear Kristen,
Good to hear from you after so long. This question comes up
in many forms, and I've answered it many times; so part of what I'll do is
refer you to some additional resources in a moment that unpack the subject of
newspaper horoscopes.
It may seem like there is a big difference between what an
astrologer reading your natal chart does with a lot of detailed information,
and what a newspaper astrologer does knowing nothing about you per se. In
reality, the difference is not as big as it seems, and it is astrology itself
that the two processes have in common.
Perhaps a metaphor or two will suffice to convey the idea.
It's possible to take a picture of a willow tree and show it to someone and
they will easily recognize it. It's also possible to have a DNA sample of that
tree and the right scientist can confirm that it came from a willow tree. One
gives you only minimal information; one provides a lot of highly specific data.
In both cases, the tree is recognizable from an image.
Let's go a step further. A poet could look at a picture of a
willow tree and write a few descriptive lines that characterize the tree, in
such a way that most people would recognize. You could say:
A great old creature, loose and swaying, but somehow sure
Craving water, she'll crack pipes of steel drink it pure.
Roots reaching into the ground, where her branches end
When the great rains come, she survives, because she bends.
Now, we don't need a DNA sample of a willow tree to write
that, or to recognize the image that is presented, or even to find some
personal meaning in it -- or to actually learn something about willow trees.
So, the simplest answer to your question is that astrology
gives enough information that it works on any level, whether a writer comes up
with something simple in a horoscope column, or a natal astrologer does precise
calculations for your chart. A lot of it involves how well the astrologer
recognizes an image in the planets, how well they describe it, and to a real
extent, how intuitive they are.
Short horoscopes can be accurate without giving every
detail. And, the one detail they give, or the confirmation of a situation they
may provide, may be enough to get the job done that day.
Remember that with any form of communication, we all bring
our own interpretation. This is true whether a person is reading a technical
article, seeing a Shakespeare play, or reading a horoscope. Whether it's done
intentionally or not, a horoscope column uses this quality of perception: we
each bring our own meaning, and the writer and the reader engage in a little
collaboration.
So, while on the one hand you could say they are
"general readings written for millions of people," it's also accurate
to say they are the work of one unique writer, read by an individual reader,
and this is about as personal as it gets.
Thanks for your question, Kristen.
Here are a few articles on horoscope columns, which will
give you all you need to know to start writing them yourself.