Maybe not so far off when I run the chart on Astro.com – based on the light I arbitrarily chose 7:!3 am which is certainly not correct, but perhaps not too far off.
Only thing that bothered me before running the chart was the reflected “luminary” in the window on our left looking at the photo. That would in fact be the sun. The luminary partically obsured by the lead figure’s head must be Part of Fortune.
xo
I like how you caused-to-happen groupings of geometric pattern with light – for example using shadow to mark checkerboard across the floor and create a family of planetary rings out of the barstool footrests.
I’ll bet you could almost read this chart ahem photo.
xo
Clue: the luminaries are riding either side of the MC.
Love you.
Jere
find yourself here where you are everything butt an asshole….
xo
So, my friend,.. will you elucidate on corn syrup? (..or shall I wrangle up the assholes, who will in test, demean the general public, while riding an ego train to hell!) (Me)
The Foto does have cool contrast, by the way.. I dig shadow-land!
With fair-play, openness, and transparency..
Jere
and Love… respect, and a deep-ass bow.
(I’ve been an asshole lately, I know it, I’m trying to slip to where I belong, Not where I find myself.. Even though it is all continuity..)
Love, Peace
J
Simple, yeah… LOL!
thanx, bro !!
Well, with the camera in manual operation….this photo shows you the contrasty, vivid quality of the lens. It’s early in the morning, so the light is long. I am facing into the light so the shadows thrust toward me. This is why many photographers only shoot early in the morning or late in the afternoon, to get the nice long light rather than overhead light. The photo is enhanced greatly by the design of the building, with light coming from several directions, the soda fridge sign lighting up and the shelf throwing a shadow as well.
In Photoshop, the only thing I did was lighten up the shadows to give a little extra detail on the dark end.
The width of the lens helps a lot, which is 21mm (nice and wide, so it gets the whole side of the room) and since my camera has a full frame sensor, you get the 21mm as such — not chopped to 35mm as it would be on a normal digital. This is one of the problems with most digital cameras — the apparent focal length is increased by the image captor being smaller. What wide angle gives you is perspective and context, which is what I love about it, and the full frame sensor takes advantage of that.
The camera settings were recorded as: ISO 200 (slow speed); f 6.3, shutter speed 1/320th. So there was a lot of light pouring in, the image is a bit underexposed, so you get the deep shadows and the splashy light.
Simple!
Ok. this is a freakin cool photo with the shadows. I would love to hear how you captured this…
LOL!
Maybe not so far off when I run the chart on Astro.com – based on the light I arbitrarily chose 7:!3 am which is certainly not correct, but perhaps not too far off.
Only thing that bothered me before running the chart was the reflected “luminary” in the window on our left looking at the photo. That would in fact be the sun. The luminary partically obsured by the lead figure’s head must be Part of Fortune.
xo
I like how you caused-to-happen groupings of geometric pattern with light – for example using shadow to mark checkerboard across the floor and create a family of planetary rings out of the barstool footrests.
I’ll bet you could almost read this chart ahem photo.
xo
Clue: the luminaries are riding either side of the MC.
Love you.
Jere
find yourself here where you are everything butt an asshole….
xo
So, my friend,.. will you elucidate on corn syrup? (..or shall I wrangle up the assholes, who will in test, demean the general public, while riding an ego train to hell!) (Me)
The Foto does have cool contrast, by the way.. I dig shadow-land!
With fair-play, openness, and transparency..
Jere
and Love… respect, and a deep-ass bow.
(I’ve been an asshole lately, I know it, I’m trying to slip to where I belong, Not where I find myself.. Even though it is all continuity..)
Love, Peace
J
Simple, yeah… LOL!
thanx, bro !!
Well, with the camera in manual operation….this photo shows you the contrasty, vivid quality of the lens. It’s early in the morning, so the light is long. I am facing into the light so the shadows thrust toward me. This is why many photographers only shoot early in the morning or late in the afternoon, to get the nice long light rather than overhead light. The photo is enhanced greatly by the design of the building, with light coming from several directions, the soda fridge sign lighting up and the shelf throwing a shadow as well.
In Photoshop, the only thing I did was lighten up the shadows to give a little extra detail on the dark end.
The width of the lens helps a lot, which is 21mm (nice and wide, so it gets the whole side of the room) and since my camera has a full frame sensor, you get the 21mm as such — not chopped to 35mm as it would be on a normal digital. This is one of the problems with most digital cameras — the apparent focal length is increased by the image captor being smaller. What wide angle gives you is perspective and context, which is what I love about it, and the full frame sensor takes advantage of that.
The camera settings were recorded as: ISO 200 (slow speed); f 6.3, shutter speed 1/320th. So there was a lot of light pouring in, the image is a bit underexposed, so you get the deep shadows and the splashy light.
Simple!
Ok. this is a freakin cool photo with the shadows. I would love to hear how you captured this…